On January 30, 1976, the Supreme Court of the United States issued the infamous Buckley v. Valeo ruling that struck down campaign finance reforms intended to reduce the undue influence of wealthy interests on election outcomes.  By wrongly equating big money in politics with free speech, the Court has blocked reforms to our electoral process that would let ordinary Americans determine who runs for office, who  wins elections, and what issues dominate the agenda.

The Buck Buckley Campaign

News Releases

U. S. Supreme Court To Review Campaign Spending Limits 9/27/05

Legal and Policy Experts Debate Campaign Spending Limits 8/2/05

Campaign Spending Limits Forum and Debate, August 2, 2005; Georgetown University Law Center, Statement of Adam Lioz, State PIRGs Democracy Advocate 8/2/04

Remarks of Brenda Wright, Managing Attorney, National Voting
Rights Institute, on “Campaign Spending Limits – the Next
Generation of Campaign Reform?” Georgetown University School of
Law
8/2/05

Broad Coalition Urges U.S. Supreme Court to Review Campaign Spending Limits Case 6/15/05

Vermont Group Files Petition Seeking Supreme Court Review of Campaign Spending Limits Case
5/12/05

Federal Appeals Court Lets Stand A Landmark Ruling That Campaign Spending Limits May Be Constitutional
2/14/05

Advocates Vow Continued Defense of Campaign Spending Limits Following Supreme Court's Denial of Review in Albuquerque Spending Limits Case
11/29/04

Ruling Revisits Supreme Court's 1976 Decision in Buckley v Valeo
8/18/04

Court Says Campaign Spending Caps Can Be Constitutional: Case remanded for decision on the details of Vermont's law 8/18/04

Unprecedented Coalition Of Public Interest Groups Launches National Initiative To Limit Campaign Spending 7/22/04

Home

News Releases

Why We Need Spending Limits

Myths About Spending Limits

Overview of Albuquerque and Vermont Cases

More Details on the Vermont Case

What Current and Former Officials Are Saying About Buckley

What Legal Experts Are Saying About Buckley